This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More
In an era where a single social media post can reach thousands of people in seconds, the value of a reputation has never been higher. Whether you are a business owner in Suffolk or a private individual, the words spoken or written about you can have a profound impact on your mental health as well as your standing in the community.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!One of the most frequent questions we encounter at Wayman & Long is: “Someone has said something untrue about me; can I take them to court?”
The answer lies within the realm of civil litigation and in this blog we’ll explore how civil litigation is used to tackle defamation and how you can protect your reputation under UK law.
To answer the title’s question simply: Yes, civil litigation can be used in defamation cases. In fact, civil litigation is the most common option for resolving defamation claims in England and Wales.
In legal terms, defamation is classified as a ‘tort’; a civil wrongdoing that results in harm or loss to another person. Whilst criminal cases are initiated by the CPS and carry the risk of prison time, civil litigation is a private dispute between two parties; the claimant (the victim) and the defendant (the accused).
In these instances, the court’s primary objective isn’t to hand out a jail sentence but rather to ‘make the victim whole again’. This is typically achieved through damages; financial compensation for the harm caused or a court-ordered injunction, which legally forces the defendant to stop spreading the defamatory claims.
Within civil litigation, defamation is split into two categories:
Defamation in a permanent form, such as written articles, social media posts, emails or even YouTube videos.
Defamation in a transient or temporary form, usually spoken words or gestures.
Following the Defamation Act 2013, the landscape of civil litigation changed significantly. To prevent trivial claims from clogging up the courts, the law introduced a serious harm threshold. Section 1(1) of the Act states that a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the reputation of the claimant. For businesses, this harm is only considered to be serious if it has caused or is likely to cause serious financial losses.
This is often the first major hurdle in any litigation process; proving that an insult was merely upsetting is not enough, it must be demonstrated that damage to your reputation has occurred or will occur.
If you believe that you have been defamed, the process of civil litigation typically follows a structured path. At Wayman & Long we always advocate for a strategic approach that results in a quick resolution:
Most cases begin with a formal Letter Before Action; a crucial step in civil litigation. It outlines the specific statements that are defamatory, explains why they are false and sets out the remedies that you are seeking (such as a public apology and/or damages). Oftentimes, a robust legal letter is enough to resolve the dispute without ever stepping foot in a courtroom.
The court expects both parties to behave reasonably and try to settle the matter through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), such as mediation. Skipping this step can lead to cost penalties later in the litigation process.
If the defendant refuses to retract the statement or offer compensation, the next step is to issue a claim in the High Court. Defamation cases are complex and are almost exclusively heard in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court.
When you initiate civil litigation for defamation, the defendant has several statutory defences they may rely upon and understanding these is vital for any claimant:
If the defendant can prove that the statement is substantially true, the claim will fail.
This applies if the statement was an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact, based on something that existed at the time.
This is often used by journalists. If the defendant can show the statement was on a matter of public interest and they reasonably believed publishing it was in the public interest, they may have a defence.
Statements made in Parliament or in court proceedings are absolutely privileged, meaning they cannot be the subject of a defamation claim.
You might wonder if the stress of a court case is worth it. Whilst litigation is a serious undertaking, it offers several unique remedies:
Financial awards to compensate for emotional distress and proven financial loss.
A court order forcing the defendant to remove the defamatory material and preventing them from repeating the claims.
Perhaps most importantly, a successful civil litigation case provides a public declaration that the allegations made against you were false; effectively clearing your name.
Time is of the essence in defamation cases. Under the Limitation Act 1980, the time limit for bringing a defamation claim is just one year from the date of publication. This is a much shorter window than most other civil litigation claims (which often have a six-year limit); reflecting the law’s view that reputational damage should be addressed immediately.
Navigating the complexities of the Defamation Act and the civil courts requires specialist expertise. Defamation is a nuanced area of law where the meaning of words is often the central focal point. What one person considers to be a joke; the law may consider to be damaging.
At Wayman & Long, we provide clear, no-nonsense advice and help our clients to determine:
Whether you are seeking to protect your personal integrity or your business’s brand, we offer the professional guidance necessary to navigate the civil litigation process. After all, civil litigation isn’t just a tool for big corporations, it’s a vital protection for anyone whose reputation has been unfairly tarnished. Whilst the legal bars are high, particularly regarding the serious harm test, the law provides a fair framework for those who have been wronged.
If you are facing a situation where false statements are damaging your life or business, don’t wait for the one-year clock to run out. Book a consultation with the team at Wayman & Long today to discuss your options and take the first step toward restoring your reputation.
Created & Managed By Space Rocket Digital